Complaint against Tiscali upheld by ASA

Complaint against Tiscali upheld by ASA

July 26, 2015

The Advertising Standards Authority has upheld a complaint made against Tiscali that it broadcast a misleading radio advertisement. BT and two members of the public challenged the ad on the grounds that the emphasis of the 30 second advertisement was on a £9.99 introductory price, and the significant condition that the price rose to £14.99 after three months was not mentioned until the end. It was felt it was difficult to hear.

Tiscali believed the ad was not misleading because all details of the offer were read out clearly in the disclaimer, which included the words: “Subject to availability, non cable phone line required. Up to 2Mb. £9.99 a month for the first three months, then £14.99”.

Tiscali argued that their competitors advertised introductory pricing offers in exactly the same way, and pointed out that a current BT national press ad displayed a price of £8.95, with the £17.99 thereafter price within their disclaimer in very small print. As there was a lot to fit in to 30 seconds, the disclaimer was read more quickly than the main body of the advertisement.

The Radio Advertising Clearance Centre had cleared the ad for broadcast noting that previously the same advertisement had not received complaints. It pointed out, however, that it reviewed the script rather than the audio recording and, as such, the terms and conditions would have been expected to be clearly audible.

The ASA noted Tiscali’s argument that, although it was spoken more quickly than all of the preceding information in the ad, the £14.99 price increase after three months was spoken clearly. However, the authority also noted that the main emphasis of the ad was on the £9.99 introductory price, which was repeated many times and at a louder volume than the single reference to the £14.99 price which, in contrast, was mentioned once, quickly and softly.

As it was considered that the increase to £14.99 after three months was a significant condition that should have been made clear in the advertisement, the ASA concluded that the ad was misleading.

It was ruled that the advertisement breached CAP (Broadcast) Radio Advertising Standards Code Section 2 Rule 3 (Misleadingness), and that it must not reappear in its current form.

Tim Yeo

Related Posts

MTI combats recession with WiMax and RFID products

Comments Off on MTI combats recession with WiMax and RFID products

RadioFrame releases OmniRadio for LTE and WiMax

Comments Off on RadioFrame releases OmniRadio for LTE and WiMax

Another mobile-TV PND from Garmin

Comments Off on Another mobile-TV PND from Garmin

Tiscali moves into quad-play with Toucan Mobile

Comments Off on Tiscali moves into quad-play with Toucan Mobile

Health Protection Agency to study Wi-Fi safety

Comments Off on Health Protection Agency to study Wi-Fi safety

MediaTek boosts Q3 sales projection

Comments Off on MediaTek boosts Q3 sales projection

Ixia updates IxRave IP Service Verification

Comments Off on Ixia updates IxRave IP Service Verification

Sprint sets up Taiwan WiMax testing lab

Comments Off on Sprint sets up Taiwan WiMax testing lab

Rewards for those moving to Eclipse business broadband service

Comments Off on Rewards for those moving to Eclipse business broadband service

Telecoms firms upbeat on economic prospects

Comments Off on Telecoms firms upbeat on economic prospects

Costly way to download TV

Comments Off on Costly way to download TV

Actix Viewpoint 1.4 developments

Comments Off on Actix Viewpoint 1.4 developments

Create Account



Log In Your Account